RE: [patch] vectorizer cost-model: fixes and powerpc testcases

["Jagasia, Harsha" <harsha dot jagasia at amd dot com>]

Hi Dorit,

>Harsha, I had to change the expected dg-final check in one of the i386
>tests due to the changes above. There maybe some things need to be
modified
>for the x86_64 tests too - could you take a look at that?

I did a quick non-bootstrap build. I had to change the expected dg-final
check on the same x86_64 test as the i386 test (patch attached)

ChangeLogs:
* gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/x86_64/costmodel-vect-68.c: Now vectorized.

I will bootstrap and do a full regression testing with your patch on
x86_64 and update the list in a short while.

I also noticed that you had added some sub tests based on vect-76.c to
ppc. I thought vect-76 gave similar coverage as vect-33 and hence I did
not include vect-76. Do you think otherwise i.e is it worthwhile to add
the vect-76 tests to x86_64 and i386 as well?

Thanks,
Harsha

Attachment: costmodelfixes.june18.txt
Description: costmodelfixes.june18.txt