This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA


Eric Botcazou writes:
> This is *not* OK, you're unduly pessimizing things at the RTL level.

By not marking a subset relationship between the alias set of the
field and the alias set of the containing aggregate where the alias
set of the field will never be used but only the aggregate's?  How
exactly would this effect anything other than maybe the performance of
the compiler?

Adam


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]