This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch] m68k.c: Fix build.

From: Kazu Hirata <kazu at codesourcery dot com>
To: Roman Zippel <zippel at linux-m68k dot org>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, law at redhat dot com, schwab at suse dot de
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:20:31 -0400
Subject: Re: [patch] m68k.c: Fix build.
References: <200706121114.l5CBETQL030179@sparrowhawk.codesourcery.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0706121354200.1820@scrub.home>

Hi Roman,

Your patch seems to work fine with one tweak.

 /* 1 if X is an fp register.  */
 #define FP_REG_P(X)	(REG_P (X) && FP_REGNO_P (REGNO (X)))

FP_REG_P in mainline is defined as:

#define FP_REG_P(X) (REG_P (X) && REGNO_OK_FOR_FP_P (REGNO (X)))

So you need to update the FP_REG definition. I suppose your patch is not generated against the current mainline!?

Would you care to submit your patch with a ChangeLog entry?

Kazu Hirata

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] m68k.c: Fix build.
  - From: Roman Zippel

References:
- [patch] m68k.c: Fix build.
  - From: Kazu Hirata
- Re: [patch] m68k.c: Fix build.
  - From: Roman Zippel

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]