This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Hi, Just the normal s/PLUS_EXPR/POINTER_PLUS_EXPR/ issue with both ia64 and s390 and having a BIT_AND_EXPR in pointer type for ia64. Committed to the branch after a build and a small test with a function that uses variable arguments. It would nice if someone who has access to these targets run the testsuite and report any regressions vs the trunk. Thanks, Andrew Pinski * config/ia64/ia64.c (ia64_gimplify_va_arg): Use POINTER_PLUS_EXPR for pointers and create the BIT_AND_EXPR in sizetype. * config/s390/s390.c (s390_va_start): Use POINTER_PLUS_EXPR for pointers instead of PLUS_EXPR. (s390_gimplify_va_arg): Likewise.
Attachment:
fixia64s390.diff.txt
Description: Text document
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |