This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: tests for compiler (non-)limits

From: Geoffrey Keating <geoffk at apple dot com>
To: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches List <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 17:19:36 -0700
Subject: Re: tests for compiler (non-)limits
References: <20070424030219.043415E2537F@geoffk5.apple.com> <84fc9c000705301421u726aaa83v7ed9e47978c69766@mail.gmail.com>

On 30/05/2007, at 2:21 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:

* gcc.c-torture/compile/limits-structnest.c: New.
This one makes me swap and cry. Please throttle it down one magnitude.

It would be better if you could work out why it's causing you to swap and fix that instead; it didn't seem to require 1G of RAM on my system and there's no reason why it should, that would imply that each structure definition is taking 100K, for a structure with one field! Perhaps this is a recent regression? Could you narrow it down to a specific patch?

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

References:
- Re: tests for compiler (non-)limits
  - From: Richard Guenther

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]