This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [testsuite gfortran] partial fix for secnds*.f


> However...  as a general rule, I've learned that it is better to add real
> values from small to big (less loss of precision that way).  

What I have learned too, but apparently this is a trick for fortran 
dinosaurs!-)

> Would it make more sense to change the order of terms in the secnds
> intrinsic?

Probably yes, but having only access to binaries on the linux boxes, I have
chosen the available solution from the fortran side.  Since the problem 
deals only with the ms (the orther part is an integer), I am not sure
it worth the trouble to change the intrinsic.  However if it is decided
to change it, I have found another buglet in addition to the format 
pointed by Steve Kargl.  What I can do is to put all the fixes together
and submit the corresponding patch.

Dominique


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]