This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: New libtool is in the GCC and Src trees.


On May 24, 2007, at 2:14 PM, libtool@cwilson.fastmail.fm wrote:
Instead of fixing gcc's local copy, shouldn't this fix -- or a better one -- instead be submitted to libtool, and then gcc can resync? (At least in the medium-to-long term. For an immediate and temporary fix for a broken build, as long as it IS temporary...)

I agree. I'm happy to have the hack in gcc so that we don't have gcc not building and testing for the next month, but really, those options should work on the compiler. If someone is passing them to the linker, well, that's wrong. If to the compiler, I don't quite see what went wrong, and no one said what went wrong. Cleaverly, I was waiting on other recent breakages to go away before updating, so I didn't see what went wrong.



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]