This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Bug fortran/32027] [4.3 Regression] The "DO" variable isn't consistent after loop

From: FX Coudert <fxcoudert at gmail dot com>
To: Fortran List <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc-patches List <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 00:08:44 +0200
Subject: Re: [Bug fortran/32027] [4.3 Regression] The "DO" variable isn't consistent after loop
References: <bug-32027-682@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> <20070521215646.28173.qmail@sourceware.org>

Attached is the patch I committed to mainline after regtesting on i686-linux, under the "obvious" rule. I just didn't took care of the final value of the loop counter when I initially wrote this patch. I do apologize for the inconvenience.

FX

Attachment: loop-regress.diff
Description: Binary data

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]