This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] Fix PR30957
- From: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at bitrange dot com>
- To: Revital1 Eres <ERES at il dot ibm dot com>
- Cc: rakdver at atrey dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 11:56:51 -0400 (EDT)
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix PR30957
- References: <OF1063117A.84888068-ONC22572C5.00210075-C22572C5.00230352@il.ibm.com>
On Sun, 22 Apr 2007, Revital1 Eres wrote:
>(See attached file: pr30957-1.c.txt)
I can't quote it by simple means in this mailer, as it was
attached rather than in-text, but did you really mean for the
test-case to xfail for powerpc-spe and vax (and why the vax)
rather than skip the test for them?
Or rather: is the better choice not to skip the test for these
targets? I'm asking because the test fails for cris-elf as
well, and I suspect you don't know the test-machinery to express
the skipping. Perhaps best a check_effective_target_* thingy
(grep in testsuite/lib/*.exp) to express what the target must
have in order for the test-case to be valid?
brgds, H-P