This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [tuples] constructors and assorted infrastructure

From: Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at redhat dot com>
To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gmail dot com>
Cc: dnovillo at acm dot org, rth at redhat dot com, amacleod at redhat dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 15:46:18 -0400
Subject: Re: [tuples] constructors and assorted infrastructure
References: <20070504134547.GA17097@redhat.com> <de8d50360705041007r70adaab5i7e4a8ae4de3f87e5@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 10:07:14AM -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On 5/4/07, Aldy Hernandez <aldyh@redhat.com> wrote:
> >-#define GS_SEQ_INIT {0, 0}
> >+#define GS_SEQ_INIT (struct gs_sequence) {0, 0}
> 
> You cannot use C99 in GCC sources.

What is recommended?  memset?  or something like this:

#define GS_SEQ_INIT(SEQ)	((SEQ).first = NULL, (SEQ).last = NULL)

  struct gs_sequence blah;
  GS_SEQ_INIT (blah)

??

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tuples] constructors and assorted infrastructure
  - From: Richard Henderson

References:
- [tuples] constructors and assorted infrastructure
  - From: Aldy Hernandez
- Re: [tuples] constructors and assorted infrastructure
  - From: Andrew Pinski

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]