This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR 29609, being able to set a breakpoint on goto/continue/break

From: Tristan Gingold <gingold at adacore dot com>
To: Steven Bosscher <stevenb dot gcc at gmail dot com>
Cc: "Tristan Gingold" <gingold at act-europe dot fr>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 11:49:49 +0200
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix PR 29609, being able to set a breakpoint on goto/continue/break
References: <7DED6660-B71E-4C19-9AA5-54BCEA20BB62@adacore.com> <200704262304.58461.steven@gcc.gnu.org> <20070430091310.GA1646@belfast.act-europe.fr> <571f6b510704300219m2e7ee9aaw1428f6f863c172d5@mail.gmail.com> <BC5DF13B-97ED-4236-9769-89F48F76F21B@adacore.com> <571f6b510704300454u70e01af3x704d63ec9d1d415a@mail.gmail.com> <20070430120418.GA30065@caradoc.them.org> <571f6b510704300506p15507556if28723c33e6dd2b5@mail.gmail.com> <571f6b510704300515n6b3cf38fj3efc034007fc66e5@mail.gmail.com>

On Apr 30, 2007, at 2:15 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:

Hm no. Actually you're right.  For the explicit goto we do need the
separate basic block, because, as you said, we always end up stepping
onto the break if it's treated as an implicit goto. Hmm...  But that
still feels wrong somehow.  I need to think this over some more...
Maybe we can still fix this in cfgexpand instead of adding extra basic
blocks.

Hi Steven,

are you still working on this problem ?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Fix PR 29609, being able to set a breakpoint on goto/continue/break
  - From: Steven Bosscher

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]