This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: non-local goto optimization

From: Nathan Sidwell <nathan at codesourcery dot com>
To: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:15:59 +0100
Subject: Re: non-local goto optimization
References: <462C6A54.7080502@codesourcery.com> <200704241749.05651.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr>

Eric Botcazou wrote:

Moreover, going further than Richard, perhaps we can simply avoid adding yet another bit to struct function altogether? It is very little used. What about factoring the reload1.c code into a function and invoking it both from there and from expand_builtin_unwind_init?

expand_builtin_unwind_init needs to *tell* reload something, I don't see how what you describe achieves that

nathan

--
Nathan Sidwell    ::   http://www.codesourcery.com   ::         CodeSourcery
nathan@codesourcery.com    ::     http://www.planetfall.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk

Follow-Ups:
- Re: non-local goto optimization
  - From: Eric Botcazou

References:
- non-local goto optimization
  - From: Nathan Sidwell
- Re: non-local goto optimization
  - From: Eric Botcazou

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]