This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] pass @-files to collect2 and beyond

From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gmail dot com>
Cc: Dave Korn <dave dot korn at artimi dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, froydnj at codesourcery dot com
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 15:04:39 -0700
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pass @-files to collect2 and beyond
References: <20070413194954.GE9017@sparrowhawk.codesourcery.com> <de8d50360704131420w2da7d8cq5e96bb610a686877@mail.gmail.com> <462277AC.1060800@codesourcery.com> <013801c77f94$013227a0$2e08a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> <46228A87.40608@codesourcery.com> <de8d50360704151450x1f95fa24l5d6f7b8efb512f7a@mail.gmail.com>

Andrew Pinski wrote:

> Yes but response files are also nice if you want to set a common
> options and don't want a long CFLAGS/LDFLAGS.  So getting it to work
> with older binutils is also nice.

After Nathan gets his stuff working, I'd be happy to review a patch to
add configury goo to make it smarter.  However, I still think that
starting with just HAVE_GNU_LD would be fine.

-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
mark@codesourcery.com
(650) 331-3385 x713

References:
- [PATCH] pass @-files to collect2 and beyond
  - From: Nathan Froyd
- Re: [PATCH] pass @-files to collect2 and beyond
  - From: Andrew Pinski
- Re: [PATCH] pass @-files to collect2 and beyond
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- RE: [PATCH] pass @-files to collect2 and beyond
  - From: Dave Korn
- Re: [PATCH] pass @-files to collect2 and beyond
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: [PATCH] pass @-files to collect2 and beyond
  - From: Andrew Pinski

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]