Hi,
Committed as obvious.
Kazu Hirata
2007-04-15 Kazu Hirata <kazu@codesourcery.com>
* fortran/gfc-internals.texi: Fix typos.
* fortran/simplify.c: Fix a comment typo.
Index: fortran/gfc-internals.texi
===================================================================
--- fortran/gfc-internals.texi (revision 123842)
+++ fortran/gfc-internals.texi (working copy)
@@ -298,7 +298,7 @@ nested chain of @code{gfc_code} structur
identified by the @code{op} member of the structure, the different
possible values are enumerated in @code{gfc_exec_op}. A special
member of this @code{enum} is @code{EXEC_NOP} which is used to
-reperesent the various @code{END} statements if they carry a label.
+represent the various @code{END} statements if they carry a label.
Depending on the type of statement some of the other fields will be
filled in. Fields that are generally applicable are the @code{next}
and @code{here} fields. The former points to the next statement in
@@ -314,7 +314,7 @@ block in question. The @code{SELECT} an
contain various blocks (the chain of @code{ELSE IF} and @code{ELSE}
blocks or the various @code{CASE}s, respectively).
-@c What would be nice here would be an example program togehter with
+@c What would be nice here would be an example program together with
@c an image that says more than the mythical thousand words.
Index: fortran/simplify.c
===================================================================
--- fortran/simplify.c (revision 123842)
+++ fortran/simplify.c (working copy)
@@ -2842,7 +2842,7 @@ gfc_simplify_repeat (gfc_expr *e, gfc_ex
}
mpz_clear (ncopies);
- /* For further simplication, we need the character string to be
+ /* For further simplification, we need the character string to be
constant. */
if (e->expr_type != EXPR_CONSTANT)
return NULL;