This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Patch] Don't provide lstat gfortran intrinsic if target doesn't support lstat.

From: FX Coudert <fxcoudert at gmail dot com>
To: Daniel Franke <franke dot daniel at gmail dot com>
Cc: "Danny Smith" <dannysmith at clear dot net dot nz>, GFORTRAN <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, GCC-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 22:00:48 +0200
Subject: Re: [Patch] Don't provide lstat gfortran intrinsic if target doesn't support lstat.
References: <56A626B0-B0D3-4B42-8FDC-3E61BEDBFAA9@gmail.com> <000001c6f66e$010f4050$6c4861cb@anykey> <640ad44b0704130541p1979d14cx51a322fb8da226c@mail.gmail.com> <19c433eb0704130556l281c4760tce900e0ea89e802b@mail.gmail.com> <640ad44b0704130606x7b0355p61fc55ecc3519ad1@mail.gmail.com>

It could be applied, since it's a regression wrt g77. As GCC >= 4.0.0
is not used by the mingw project, I thought it was not high-priority
to backport it. But, as I recently read Danny saying he'll make a
MinGW GCC-4.2.0 candidate when 4.2.0 is released, it is probably a
good reason to do it.

Seconded.

Commited to 4.2.

FX

References:
- Re: [Patch] Don't provide lstat gfortran intrinsic if target doesn't support lstat.
  - From: Daniel Franke
- Re: [Patch] Don't provide lstat gfortran intrinsic if target doesn't support lstat.
  - From: François-Xavier Coudert
- Re: [Patch] Don't provide lstat gfortran intrinsic if target doesn't support lstat.
  - From: Daniel Franke

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]