This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [gortran, PATCH] Fix PR 18937
- From: Tobias Schlüter <tobias dot schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de>
- To: Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at verizon dot net>
- Cc: Toon Moene <toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl>, Fortran List <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, stevenb dot gcc at gmail dot com
- Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 15:50:11 +0200
- Subject: Re: [gortran, PATCH] Fix PR 18937
- References: <4606EB73.8080109@physik.uni-muenchen.de> <460815A1.2080704@moene.indiv.nluug.nl> <4608181F.2070301@physik.uni-muenchen.de> <461E7DDF.4030503@physik.uni-muenchen.de> <461F2529.5050006@verizon.net>
Jerry DeLisle wrote:
Tobias Schlüter wrote:
Tobias Schlüter wrote:
Thanks, now that look over this I see that 8.2 has all this collected
in one place. Wonder how I missed this before. Anyway, trying a few
corner cases, I already found a weird preexisting bug and I see a few
additional things I'll have to do. Sigh, why aren't labels on
statements that are not branch-target statements disallowed or at
least deprecated?
I'm fairly sure we're doing the right thing in all cases, i.e. with
respect to the preexisting bug I was mistaken. Since you guys are on
a roll, can anybody approve this? I promise to complement it with a
testcase verifying that I was indeed mistaken
OK for trunk.
Thanks, this is r123789, the promised additional testcase is
gfortran.dg/goto_3.f90.
Cheers,
- Tobi