Re: [patch, fortran, documentation] random_seed, random_number

[Brooks Moses <brooks dot moses at codesourcery dot com>]

At 02:23 PM 4/11/2007, Daniel Franke wrote:
> eventually I found time to get this right. Sorry for the confusion on my 
> side.
> Here is the paragraph again. If you agree that it's correct now, I'll commit
> the full patch. Thanks for your input =)
>
> -- RANDOM_SEED, PUT argument --
> @item @var{PUT}  @tab (Optional) Shall be an array of type default
> @code{INTEGER} and rank one. It is @code{INTENT(IN)} and the size of
> the array must be larger than or equal to the number returned by the
> @var{SIZE} argument.

This looks right to me, yes!

> P.S. How do you people manage to spent so much time on gcc/gfortran? I'm 
> happy
> if I can slice off a couple of hours a week?!

Lately, it's because I am writing my dissertation, and it's amazing how 
much one can accomplish when in a "I don't want to look at my dissertation 
for another minute; what can I do to take my mind off it?" state....

(I probably am going to be pretty quiet on gfortran stuff for the next two 
or three weeks, though, while trying to finish it.)

- Brooks