This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

[patch] fix -fstack-protector target-supports.exp

From: Eric Christopher <echristo at apple dot com>
To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gmail dot com>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, janis187 at us dot ibm dot com
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 19:33:27 -0700
Subject: [patch] fix -fstack-protector target-supports.exp
References: <C846C091-D6DD-428F-8EB4-35C74EA43789@apple.com> <de8d50360704091116m2e6968edsc159763e7c9a5c23@mail.gmail.com>

On Apr 9, 2007, at 11:16 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote:

On 3/13/07, Eric Christopher <echristo@apple.com> wrote:

Here's a couple of quick tests to ensure that -fstack-protector is
working. I've got them enabled for native only.

Tested on x86_64-linux-gnu, x86-darwin, x86_64-darwin, mipsisa64-elf
(to make sure they didn't run).


These testcase fails if libc does not have ssp support and libssp is
not installed already:

OK, here's a fix for it. Tested on x86-darwin8 and x86-darwin9 (with and without libc ssp support). I can't try ppc since my ppc machine is unconsolable at the moment. I did try mipsisa64-elf to verify that the test isn't run there either.

Janis OK?

-eric

2007-04-09 Eric Christopher <echristo@apple.com>

	* lib/target-supports.exp (check_effective_target_fstack_protector):
	Rewrite.

Attachment: target-supports.diff.txt
Description: Text document

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] fix -fstack-protector target-supports.exp
  - From: Janis Johnson

References:
- Re: [patch] testcases for -fstack-protector
  - From: Andrew Pinski

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]