This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [C++ Patch] PR 26099 (first part)


Mark Mitchell wrote:

That is interesting indeed. I would argue that such words should never
make it into the standard; something like the TR1 wording seems much
better, as it does set a floor on which users can rely. "is known not
to" is not something that users can rely on at all; a dumb compiler
might not know anything. :-)


I understand. But don't worry, nothing is set in stone yet, in Oxford I will tell Howard and the other people your opinion about that specific point.

The revised patch is OK, with Doug's additional suggestions.

Thanks a lot, I will commit it after an additional round of regtesting later today.

Paolo.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]