This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [C++ Patch] PR 26099 (first part)
Mark Mitchell wrote:
That is interesting indeed. I would argue that such words should never
make it into the standard; something like the TR1 wording seems much
better, as it does set a floor on which users can rely. "is known not
to" is not something that users can rely on at all; a dumb compiler
might not know anything. :-)
I understand. But don't worry, nothing is set in stone yet, in Oxford I
will tell Howard and the other people your opinion about that specific
point.
The revised patch is OK, with Doug's additional suggestions.
Thanks a lot, I will commit it after an additional round of regtesting
later today.
Paolo.