This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch] testcases for -fstack-protector

From: Eric Christopher <echristo at apple dot com>
To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gmail dot com>
Cc: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 23:16:38 -0700
Subject: Re: [patch] testcases for -fstack-protector
References: <C846C091-D6DD-428F-8EB4-35C74EA43789@apple.com> <20070320163010.GC27460@redhat.com> <80B52D42-B9CC-4E25-9AE6-8336981DDCFE@apple.com> <de8d50360703252233r17425dcdk4a2e63dcbcfdb365@mail.gmail.com>

On Mar 25, 2007, at 10:33 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:

On 3/25/07, Eric Christopher <echristo@apple.com> wrote:
Like this? Slightly different but still works.

Tested on powerpc-darwin with FRAME_GROWS_DOWNWARD set to 0.
I think you might want to check if the program links also as some
targets might support -fstack-protector inside GCC but not compile
libssp, I think an example is powerpc-sim.

Check the tests out :) I only run them on target native.

-eric

References:
- [patch] testcases for -fstack-protector
  - From: Eric Christopher
- Re: [patch] testcases for -fstack-protector
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: [patch] testcases for -fstack-protector
  - From: Eric Christopher
- Re: [patch] testcases for -fstack-protector
  - From: Andrew Pinski

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]