This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Thread-safe profiling

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Michael Matz <matz at suse dot de>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 13:15:56 -0700
Subject: Re: Thread-safe profiling
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0703142019440.25448@wotan.suse.de> <20070320210026.GD27763@redhat.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0703211312560.25448@wotan.suse.de> <20070321152234.GA30720@redhat.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0703211928380.25448@wotan.suse.de>

On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 07:51:38PM +0100, Michael Matz wrote:
> If you have any clever idea (besides implementing negative constraints in 
> reload :-) ), I'm all ears, otherwise I'm leaning to just live with the 
> suboptimality with -fomit-frame-pointer.

Curses, foiled again.  I'm all out of clever today.
Thanks for the effort looking into this alternative.


r~

References:
- Thread-safe profiling
  - From: Michael Matz
- Re: Thread-safe profiling
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: Thread-safe profiling
  - From: Michael Matz
- Re: Thread-safe profiling
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: Thread-safe profiling
  - From: Michael Matz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]