This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Make sure copy-prop runs before forwprop, do not propagate ADDR_EXPRs to simple copy statements

From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
To: Richard Guenther <rguenther at suse dot de>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 21:32:51 -0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make sure copy-prop runs before forwprop, do not propagate ADDR_EXPRs to simple copy statements
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0703131611440.19680@zhemvz.fhfr.qr> <45F943A6.5090308@redhat.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0703151412540.19680@zhemvz.fhfr.qr>

Richard Guenther wrote on 03/15/07 09:22:

> Which is much less work than the above ;)

Gah, yeah.  Now I see what you were referring to.  Thanks.

> No, the patch is not obvious, but non-algorithmic enough for my taste.
> Do you disagree here?

No, it's fine.  It was just misunderstanding on my part.

References:
- [PATCH] Make sure copy-prop runs before forwprop, do not propagate ADDR_EXPRs to simple copy statements
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: [PATCH] Make sure copy-prop runs before forwprop, do not propagate ADDR_EXPRs to simple copy statements
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: [PATCH] Make sure copy-prop runs before forwprop, do not propagate ADDR_EXPRs to simple copy statements
  - From: Richard Guenther

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]