This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH, i386]: Implement -mcmpxchg16b and -msahf options

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz>
Cc: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com>, "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>, Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 10:42:43 -0700
Subject: Re: [PATCH, i386]: Implement -mcmpxchg16b and -msahf options
References: <5787cf470703080326r2ddebbc2y55bc1a84b1671cc3@mail.gmail.com> <20070308114046.GL470@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <20070308161140.GA22171@lucon.org> <45F077C5.2080103@gmail.com> <20070313153047.GK12761@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>

On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 04:30:47PM +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> Are there any, except for historic, reasons why those are not declared
> bool?

When included from libgcc, bool is not defined.


r~

References:
- [PATCH, i386]: Add arch flag for sahf instruction
  - From: Uros Bizjak
- Re: [PATCH, i386]: Add arch flag for sahf instruction
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: [PATCH, i386]: Add arch flag for sahf instruction
  - From: H. J. Lu
- [PATCH, i386]: Implement -mcmpxchg16b and -msahf options
  - From: Uros Bizjak
- Re: [PATCH, i386]: Implement -mcmpxchg16b and -msahf options
  - From: Jan Hubicka

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]