This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Improve debug info for Ada (3/4)

From: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at adacore dot com>
To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 22:17:27 +0100
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improve debug info for Ada (3/4)
References: <200702122028.46692.ebotcazou@adacore.com> <20070212195736.GD1339@redhat.com>

> Is there some way to avoid adding the extra block if the
> function already has one?  Or is this moot because we
> wind up stripping empty BLOCKS later?

Are you talking about the extra BIND_EXPR or really about the new block?

-- 
Eric Botcazou

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Improve debug info for Ada (3/4)
  - From: Richard Henderson

References:
- [PATCH] Improve debug info for Ada (3/4)
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: [PATCH] Improve debug info for Ada (3/4)
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]