This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: CALL_EXPR representation changes coming; need patch reviewer(s)
On Feb 8, 2007, at 5:12 PM, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
The problem is if there are more conflicts introduced during the
"build" period between "resolve conflicts" and "svn ci" --
especially if we add "test" after "build".
If you need a test cycle, by all means add one, but, if you add one,
you can also add one more svn up and build post testing, just before
ci if you are worried about:
If you're willing to accept that there may be a time period when
I'm still cleaning up merge-related problems in checked-in code
An up-to-date incremental build is around 2 seconds on my machine,
cheap enough to just do it. One can engineer it so that the time
between the second to the last build and the last build is under five
minutes. With that type of window for breakages, no one is gonna
scream. If you put 48 hours between the two, well, then we might
notice and scream.
When I read your first email, the first thought that jumped into my
head was that you wanted to call for 72-hours of no checkins for
mainline, and then my brain screamed noooooo. I re-read Mark's rules
and your posting and concluded that my worst fear wasn't implied by
what you said, though, it wasn't ruled out either. :-)