This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [m68k 09/13] Convert some text peepholes
- From: Jeffrey Law <law at redhat dot com>
- To: Richard Sandiford <richard at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: Roman Zippel <zippel at linux-m68k dot org>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 10:01:11 -0700
- Subject: Re: [m68k 09/13] Convert some text peepholes
- References: <20070130112615.782382000@linux-m68k.org> <20070130114607.772574000@linux-m68k.org> <87lkjkbq5u.fsf@firetop.home> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0702060427130.14457@scrub.home> <87sldjivm4.fsf@firetop.home>
- Reply-to: law at redhat dot com
On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 07:38 +0000, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> It's your call, but seeing as the patch I posted has been approved,
> and is only waiting on an unapproved dependent patch, it might be
> better to hold off this discussion until either (a) that patch gets
> reviewed, or (b) the approval of the patch I posted is reversed.
> (It's only a suggestion -- doing patches against mainline is obviously
> the right thing to do, and I'm not trying to imply otherwise.
> Also, if there's something you object to in that patch -- the UNSPEC? --
> then I can try to fix it.)
Which pending patch is your peephole conversion patch dependent upon?
jeff