This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFA:] Make 23_containers/set/modifiers/16728.cc not time out nonnatively


On Mon, 5 Feb 2007, Joe Buck wrote:

> But in this case, does anyone actually benefit from the extra iterations?
> Are they testing anything that is not tested with fewer iterations?  If
> not, why not use fewer iterations everywhere?

That would be reasonable.  Just not making the difference depend on 
whether the toolchain is cross or not; if, say, I test compilers for 
powerpc-linux, the test should be the same whether I run a compiler on the 
powerpc-linux system, or run it on an i686-linux system with the tests run 
on the powerpc-linux system via ssh.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]