This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
>>>>> Paolo Bonzini writes: Paolo> I'm referring to toplevel ASM_INPUTs, i.e. old-style asms. New-style Paolo> asms appear as an ASM_OPERANDS insn, not an ASM_INPUT insn. Oh, in that sense. A user-generated ASM_INPUT probably always should be marked as volatile. I think it's an open question whether a non-volatile ASM_INPUT ever would be useful. David
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |