This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: PATCH: calculate CDI_DOMINATORS in tree-ssa-sink


Steven Bosscher wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 January 2007 01:29, Josh Conner wrote:
>> All -
>>
>> There's a relatively obvious fix that should be made in
>> execute_sink_code.  This statement:
>>
>>   calculate_dominance_info (CDI_DOMINATORS | CDI_POST_DOMINATORS);
>>
>> assuming it is intended to calculate both dominators and
>> post-dominators, is incorrect.  Since CDI_*DOMINATORS are enums and not
>> bitfields (CDI_DOMINATORS==0 and CDI_POST_DOMINATORS==1), we're only
>> calculating post-dom info.
> 
> This is not the first time that this bug had to be fixed in some
> pass.  You get to score Mega Bonus Points if you can fix the
> problem at the root:
> 
> Index: basic-block.h
> ===================================================================
> --- basic-block.h       (revision 120352)
> +++ basic-block.h       (working copy)
> @@ -935,8 +935,8 @@ extern void reorder_basic_blocks (unsign
> 
>  enum cdi_direction
>  {
> -  CDI_DOMINATORS,
> -  CDI_POST_DOMINATORS
> +  CDI_DOMINATORS = 1,
> +  CDI_POST_DOMINATORS = 2
>  };
> 
>  enum dom_state
> 
> ...and a larger number of fixes in dominance.c everywhere where
> we look at dom_computed[].

OK, I could use some Mega Bonus Points -- hopefully they can be
converted into the Supreme Ultimate iPoints that my manager accepts... :)

I'll take a look into this.

- Josh


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]