This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Stricter implicit conversions between vectors, revised patch

From: Mark Shinwell <shinwell at codesourcery dot com>
To: gcc patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <paolo dot bonzini at lu dot unisi dot ch>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 13:35:39 +0000
Subject: Re: Stricter implicit conversions between vectors, revised patch
References: <458ABCF8.3020504@codesourcery.com> <458BB0B6.6000200@lu.unisi.ch> <458BB4C5.3030000@codesourcery.com>

Mark Shinwell wrote:

What is this problem?


Given what you say, I believe there is no problem.  I'll run the testsuite
again; it looks like we are finally there.


...but not quite.  Having just been discussing this with Joseph Myers it
looks like the existing compatibility rules are still in fact correct, and
another nuance has been pointed out: there shouldn't be multiple "inform"
calls about -flax-vector-conversions for i18n reasons.

Mark

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Stricter implicit conversions between vectors, revised patch
  - From: Mark Shinwell

References:
- Stricter implicit conversions between vectors, revised patch
  - From: Mark Shinwell
- Re: Stricter implicit conversions between vectors, revised patch
  - From: Paolo Bonzini
- Re: Stricter implicit conversions between vectors, revised patch
  - From: Mark Shinwell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]