This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 11:43:59AM +0530, Ranjit Mathew wrote: > On 12/17/06, Bob Rossi <bob_rossi@cox.net> wrote: > >> You're not using "/mingw" as the value for "--prefix". I remember > >> stuff not working because of this, though I cannot be sure if that > >> indeed is the problem here. > > > >Duh! OK, I'll try that change. Do I need to do this for binutils also? > > The tools in binutils (ld, as, etc.) are directly invoked by GCC > with the correct parameters while compiling. Therefore, I don't > think you need to do this. > > > >Do I even need to build binutils? The only reason I am, is because you > >did it on your web page when cross compiling. > > It's not necessary - you should be able to use the latest > pre-compiled native binutils binaries available from the > MinGW site. I needed to compile it for the cross-compiling > case since I needed binutils running on Linux creating binaries > for MinGW. I admit that I did not really need it for the > crossed-native-compiling case, but I was just being masochistic. > :-) > > I haven't used the "--with-local-prefix" option and I don't > know if it is interfering with anything here. Note that Danny > also posts his build script every time he uploads a new > MinGW GCC release and you can see for yourself just how > the released GCC for MinGW is built. For example, for > GCC 3.4.2, the build script is: > > http://downloads.sourceforge.net/mingw/gcc-3.4.2-build.sh > > You can find this on the Sourceforge.net files page for > MinGW. > > Finally, I must admit that building GCC for MinGW natively > on Windows with MSYS was just a diversion for me. I > used to always build GCC for MinGW using the crossed-native > compilation process that I have outlined in the document > that I linked to earlier. OK, well, I followed that script. I built gcc nativly with mingw and then did a 'make DESTDIR=/home/bobbybrasko/gcc/destdir install'. Then I tared up the destdir directory. Copied it over to a machine with no mingw related tools on it. I copied it into C:/mingw, cause I just want to get anything working, nevermind a relocatable version. If I try to compile 'gcc -o main main.c' it can't find stdio.h. If I try to compile 'g++ -o main main.cpp' it can't find iostream. If I then untar the mingw-runtime and the w32api into the C:/mingw directory both the gcc and g++ commands find the header files, however, they end with this error, C:\cygwin\home\bar\tmp\main>g++ -o main main.cpp g++: _spawnvp: No such file or directory My first question is, since I'm new at this, is what I'm doing sensable? Is there a better way to accomplish this? At this point, I don't even care about a relocatable gcc, since I can not even get a non-relocatable version of gcc working. BTW, if I run on the machine I compiled gcc, this command, PATH=/home/bobbybrasko/gcc/destdir/mingw/bin:$PATH gcc -o main main.c it works. However, if I run this command PATH=/home/bobbybrasko/gcc/destdir/mingw/bin:$PATH g++ -o main main.cpp it doesn't work. main.cpp:1:20: error: iostream: No such file or directory main.cpp: In function 'int main(int, char**)': Is what I'm trying to do typically complicated? The *only* way I have got anything to work was to compile gcc on a machine with --prefix=/mychoicedir and then install it with 'make install'. Then both c and cpp works fine on that machine. In fact, I was able to compile a variety of c++ libraries. Thanks, Bob Rossi
Attachment:
gcc.sh
Description: Bourne shell script
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |