This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: PATCH RFA: Support -Wmissing-declarations in C++

Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:

> | "templatized functions" is not a standard term; please say "function
> | templates" (or "specializations of function templates").  Also, you've
> | exempted members of anonymous namespaces, so that should be documented too.
> 
> The warning should NOT be conditionalized on the fact that the function is
> *explicitly* declared inline.  It suffices that it is inline.  There
> is no need for the artificial distinction.

I agree.  But, I think this is just a documentation change.  So, Ian,
please remove the "explicitly declared inline" language, and just say
"inline function".

-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
mark@codesourcery.com
(650) 331-3385 x713
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]