This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
A wrinkle here is whether or not this is valid fortran. Most compilers that I have access to seem to quietly compile this..... well, noisily, actually, since they complain about the obsolescent feature, but compile it they do. However, in the thread on comp.lang.fortran;
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.fortran/browse_thread/thread/5f5079d3fe7e534a/846f950fdb70767f#846f950fdb70767f
Michael Metcalf offers the advice that this is invalid because the alternate returns are not data object arguments and should not be counted.
Brooks, as reporter and correspondent on the fortran thread, what do you think? Is this a -std=gnu or unconditionally an error?
+ subroutine with(i,*) + subroutine without()
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |