This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Patch, fortran] PR29992 - failure to detect module procedures that are not procedures from modules
- From: Paul Thomas <paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr>
- To: Fortran List <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 02:10:34 +0100
- Subject: [Patch, fortran] PR29992 - failure to detect module procedures that are not procedures from modules
:ADDPATCH fortran:
This PR is simple enough in concept - gfortran fails to detect the
invalid reference in module procedure declarations of procedures that
are not contained by the interface scope or use associated. The only
difficulty was detecting if a procedure had been declared a module
procedure in a generic interface. The only way that I found to do this
was to add a mod_proc attribute. The attr.proc == PROC_MODULE applies
to all procedures in modules. Since the attribute is unique in its
application to a module namespace, it is neither copied nor is it use
associated.
The patch that was posted to the PR is too restrictive - it does not
allow use associated procedures; so please ignore it.
Regtested on Cygwin_NT/amd64 - OK for trunk and 4.2?
Paul
2006-12-16 Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/29992
* interface.c (check_sym_interfaces): Module procedures in a
generic must be use associated or contained in the module.
* decl.c (gfc_match_modproc): Set attribute mod_proc.
* gfortran.h (symbol_attribute): Add mod_proc atribute.
2006-12-16 Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/29992
* gfortran.dg/generic_9.f90: New test.
Index: gcc/fortran/interface.c
===================================================================
*** gcc/fortran/interface.c (revision 119697)
--- gcc/fortran/interface.c (working copy)
*************** check_sym_interfaces (gfc_symbol * sym)
*** 1009,1014 ****
--- 1009,1015 ----
{
char interface_name[100];
int k;
+ gfc_interface *p;
if (sym->ns != gfc_current_ns)
return;
*************** check_sym_interfaces (gfc_symbol * sym)
*** 1019,1024 ****
--- 1020,1037 ----
if (check_interface0 (sym->generic, interface_name))
return;
+ for (p = sym->generic; p; p = p->next)
+ {
+ if (!p->sym->attr.use_assoc
+ && p->sym->attr.mod_proc
+ && p->sym->attr.if_source != IFSRC_DECL)
+ {
+ gfc_error ("MODULE PROCEDURE '%s' at %L does not come "
+ "from a module", p->sym->name, &p->where);
+ return;
+ }
+ }
+
/* Originally, this test was aplied to host interfaces too;
this is incorrect since host associated symbols, from any
source, cannot be ambiguous with local symbols. */
Index: gcc/fortran/gfortran.h
===================================================================
*** gcc/fortran/gfortran.h (revision 119697)
--- gcc/fortran/gfortran.h (working copy)
*************** typedef struct
*** 493,499 ****
/* Function/subroutine attributes */
unsigned sequence:1, elemental:1, pure:1, recursive:1;
! unsigned unmaskable:1, masked:1, contained:1;
/* This is set if the subroutine doesn't return. Currently, this
is only possible for intrinsic subroutines. */
--- 493,499 ----
/* Function/subroutine attributes */
unsigned sequence:1, elemental:1, pure:1, recursive:1;
! unsigned unmaskable:1, masked:1, contained:1, mod_proc:1;
/* This is set if the subroutine doesn't return. Currently, this
is only possible for intrinsic subroutines. */
Index: gcc/fortran/decl.c
===================================================================
*** gcc/fortran/decl.c (revision 119694)
--- gcc/fortran/decl.c (working copy)
*************** gfc_match_modproc (void)
*** 4206,4211 ****
--- 4206,4213 ----
if (gfc_add_interface (sym) == FAILURE)
return MATCH_ERROR;
+ sym->attr.mod_proc = 1;
+
if (gfc_match_eos () == MATCH_YES)
break;
if (gfc_match_char (',') != MATCH_YES)
Index: gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/generic_9.f90
===================================================================
*** gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/generic_9.f90 (revision 0)
--- gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/generic_9.f90 (revision 0)
***************
*** 0 ****
--- 1,45 ----
+ ! { dg-do compile }
+ ! Test the patch for PR29992. The standard requires that a
+ ! module procedure be contained in the same scope as the
+ ! interface or is use associated to it(12.3.2.1).
+ !
+ ! Contributed by Daniel Franke <franke.daniel@gmail.com>
+ !
+ MODULE class_foo_type
+ TYPE :: foo
+ INTEGER :: dummy
+ END TYPE
+ contains
+ SUBROUTINE bar_init_set_int(this, value)
+ TYPE(foo), INTENT(out) :: this
+ integer, intent(in) :: value
+ this%dummy = value
+ END SUBROUTINE
+ END MODULE
+
+ MODULE class_foo
+ USE class_foo_type, ONLY: foo, bar_init_set_int
+
+ INTERFACE foo_init
+ MODULE PROCEDURE foo_init_default ! { dg-error "does not come from a module" }
+ END INTERFACE
+
+ INTERFACE bar_init
+ MODULE PROCEDURE bar_init_default, bar_init_set_int ! These are OK
+ END INTERFACE
+
+ INTERFACE
+ SUBROUTINE foo_init_default(this)
+ USE class_foo_type, ONLY: foo
+ TYPE(foo), INTENT(out) :: this
+ END SUBROUTINE
+ END INTERFACE
+
+ contains
+ SUBROUTINE bar_init_default(this)
+ TYPE(foo), INTENT(out) :: this
+ this%dummy = 42
+ END SUBROUTINE
+
+ END MODULE
+ ! { dg-final { cleanup-modules "class_foo_type class_foo" } }