This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: PR 30089: Fix ICE in operand allocation
Richard Guenther wrote on 12/14/06 09:53:
Because we use the buffer to hold separate allocations. What is killing
us here is when we try to allocate a *single* VUSE operator whose
operand list overflows the buffer. There is no provision, yet, to
allocate more than one VUSE operator per statement.
Err - how could we then ICE running out of space there? Why don't we
simply allocate another one?