This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [gfortran, testsuite] Fix bounds checking for substrings, enable bounds chekcing in dg testsuite, assorted fixes
- From: Dorit Nuzman <DORIT at il dot ibm dot com>
- To: Tobias Schlüter <tobias dot schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de>
- Cc: Tobias Burnus <burnus at net-b dot de>, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gmail dot com>, Thomas Koenig <Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de>
- Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 16:10:31 +0200
- Subject: Re: [gfortran, testsuite] Fix bounds checking for substrings, enable bounds chekcing in dg testsuite, assorted fixes
Tobias Schlüter <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote on
> Dorit Nuzman <DORIT@il.ibm.com> wrote on Sun, 10 Dec 2006:
> >> WRT the rest of the discussion, I'd like to point out that -O3
> >> -ftree-vectorize currently ICEs on a few testcases (PR30087), which is
> > Does this patch fix the problem?:
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2006-12/msg00267.html
> I can't tell. After a few days of not being able to bootstrap, I'm
> now running into trouble with the testsuite: the linker invoked in the
> testsuite doesn't find libgfortranbegin.
> > To overcome the problem Andrew mentions here -
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-12/msg00532.html,
> > you can look at how gcc.dg/vect/vect.exp computes which target options
> > use with -ftree-vectorize.
> This looks very useful, thanks for the pointer. Do you think that it
> makes sense to test gfortran with -ftree-vectorize or are vect
> testsuites comprehensive enough?
The vect testsuite is supposed to exercise all the different features of
the vectorizer, but surely we could use more testing (especially if it's
loop intensive code).
> - Tobi
> This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.