Re: [gfortran, testsuite] Fix bounds checking for substrings, enable bounds chekcing in dg testsuite, assorted fixes

[Tobias Schlüter <tobias dot schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de>]

Thomas Koenig <Thomas.Koenig@online.de> wrote on Fri, 08 Dec 2006:

> There are quite a few tests that only test the library (like the
> I/O tests).  Cycling through all the options is fairly unlikely
> to uncover any bugs.
>
> Could we put these tests into a separate directory, so they are
> run only once?  That could save a lot of time on testing.

Yes, that's a great argument for finally separating the library tests  
from the rest.  I'll look into it, as I currently know my way around  
the testsuite.

WRT the rest of the discussion, I'd like to point out that -O3  
-ftree-vectorize currently ICEs on a few testcases (PR30087), which is  
why I haven't yet applied a patch.  Nevertheless, this makes it look  
like an important test.

I don't think we should grow the list of options we cycle through,  
testsuite runtime is an issue, even if the gfortran testsuite is the  
fastest testsuite in gcc.  Anyway, things may look quite different  
with a separate testsuite for the library.

The option list I have in my tree looks like this:
{ -O0 } { -O1 } { -O2 } \
{ -O2 -ftree-vectorize } \
{ -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions - fbounds-check } \
{ -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions -funroll-loops } \
{ -O3 -g } \
{ -Os }

- Tobi


----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.