This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH,RFC] CSE path following on basic blocks


> Because I don't understand why we would write past the end of
> qty_table.  It leaves me with a feeling that, given the right test
> case, we could even trigger that problem if we use the 15 year old
> trick.
>
> But maybe I'm being too conservative.  It's a known shortcoming in
> most aerospace engineers ;-)

It would seem to me that keeping a 15-year old trick is second only to 
replacing it with a 16-year old trick, as far as conservatism is concerned, 
no? :-)

-- 
Eric Botcazou


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]