This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR tree-opt/25500 SRA vs struct containing a vector

From: Andrew_Pinski at PlayStation dot Sony dot Com
To: dnovillo at redhat dot com, paolo dot bonzini at lu dot unisi dot ch, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, mark at codesourcery dot com, richard dot guenther at gmail dot com
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 17:43:26 -0800
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix PR tree-opt/25500 SRA vs struct containing a vector

----- Message from Diego Novillo <dnovillo@redhat.com> on Wed, 15 Nov 2006 
09:20:39 -0500 -----
> Richard Guenther wrote on 11/15/06 09:01:
> > On 11/15/06, Paolo Bonzini <paolo.bonzini@lu.unisi.ch> wrote:
> >> bool single_field_in_record_p (tree type)
> >> {
> >> [ ... ]
> > single_scalar_field_in_record_p probably.  And just return false 
> on the first
> > aggregate or the second scalar.
> > 
> > Richard.
> 
> I'm fine with both suggestions.  Thanks.

Here is the newest patch with those changes included.
OK? Bootstraped and tested on i686-linux-gnu with no regressions.

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski


ChangeLog:


        * tree-sra.c (single_scalar_field_in_record_p): New function.
        (decide_block_copy): Use it.


        * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/sra-4.c: New testcase.

Attachment: newpatch.diff.txt
Description: Text document

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Fix PR tree-opt/25500 SRA vs struct containing a vector
  - From: Diego Novillo

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]