This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Well, but this is different, I think. For the cgraph functions you have a single name space, but with the ILs we have several name spaces that need to use the same terminology. We are also bound by a troglodytic implementation language, so there's little we can do.Maybe ;) but I am getting somewhat irritated by my own cgraph_ and especially cgraph_varpool prefixes. Especially the second IMO just makes code less readable by making it longer. My plan is to rename craph_varpool into varpool as variables are not cgraph after all and I am not sure what I was thinking about when I introduced it at first place. Also I hope to have more clear split in between IPA infrastructure (ipa_ stuff), pass management and the cgraph datastructure itself that is all somewhat intermixed right now in complettely misnamed cgraphunit.c...
You should've been thinking about it when inventing the name. nRTL (new
RTL) would be two characters shorter. ;-)
> In my defense, I didn't invent the name :)
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |