This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Committed] Only allow INTEGER_CSTs of integral/pointer types.

From: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
To: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
Cc: Roger Sayle <roger at eyesopen dot com>, Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 20:33:38 -0500
Subject: Re: [Committed] Only allow INTEGER_CSTs of integral/pointer types.
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0611101823320.9363-100000@www.eyesopen.com> <45561002.3080002@redhat.com>

Jason Merrill wrote:

Roger Sayle wrote:
Jason, were there any objections to this approach?  Did it bootstrap
and regression test without problems?
Nobody responded to my RFC. I'm pretty sure it tested without problems, but I'll test it again with the current tree.

Yep, still no regressions on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. If it seems reasonable to you, I'll go ahead and check it in.

Jason

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Committed] Only allow INTEGER_CSTs of integral/pointer types.
  - From: Roger Sayle

References:
- Re: [Committed] Only allow INTEGER_CSTs of integral/pointer types.
  - From: Roger Sayle
- Re: [Committed] Only allow INTEGER_CSTs of integral/pointer types.
  - From: Jason Merrill

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]