This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: libiberty: fix running extension-less binaries on windows

From: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
To: vladimir at codesourcery dot com
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 21:42:02 -0500
Subject: Re: libiberty: fix running extension-less binaries on windows
References: <200611031858.46845.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <200611040407.kA447f3R027792@greed.delorie.com> <eihkg8$50h$1@sea.gmane.org>

> Is it common to have both "foo" and "foo.exe", the first being a COM
> file? I don't think I saw a COM file in year ;-)

The problem is when you have "foo" and it's NOT a .com file, but you
try to execute it anyway.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: libiberty: fix running extension-less binaries on windows
  - From: Vladimir Prus

References:
- libiberty: fix running extension-less binaries on windows
  - From: Vladimir Prus
- Re: libiberty: fix running extension-less binaries on windows
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: libiberty: fix running extension-less binaries on windows
  - From: Vladimir Prus

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]