This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR middle-end/26306

From: kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu (Richard Kenner)
To: mark at codesourcery dot com
Cc: ebotcazou at adacore dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2006 12:49:58 EST
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix PR middle-end/26306
References: <200611051703.14455.ebotcazou@adacore.com> <454E206E.2050809@codesourcery.com>

> However, if we do want to do this in the middle end, then checking 
> TREE_ADDRESSABLE (rather than AGGREGATE_TYPE_P) might be better?  Not 
> all aggregates have BLK_MODE, so the analogy with 3.4 isn't completely 
> accurate.

It would seem to me that you need to check *both*, each for a different reason.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Fix PR middle-end/26306
  - From: Mark Mitchell

References:
- [PATCH] Fix PR middle-end/26306
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: [PATCH] Fix PR middle-end/26306
  - From: Mark Mitchell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]