This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
While preparing the multiple-datatypes project to be committed I realized I never got this bit reviewed - Diego pointed out that documentation of new tree-codes was missing from doc/c-tree.texi. Attached is the missing doc patch. Is it OK? Other than that the multiple-datatypes-vectorization project is ready to be committed, except I haven't been able to build gfortran in the last few days - getting this error: /Develop/mainline_svn/build1/./gcc/xgcc -B/Develop/mainline_svn/build1/./gcc/ -B/Develop/mainline_svn1/i386-redhat-linux/bin/ -B/Develop/mainline_svn1/i386-redhat-linux/lib/ -isystem /Develop/mainline_svn1/i386-redhat-linux/include -isystem /Develop/mainline_svn1/i386-redhat-linux/sys-include -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../../gcc/libgfortran -I. -iquote../../../gcc/libgfortran/io -I../../../gcc/libgfortran/../gcc -I../../../gcc/libgfortran/../gcc/config -I../.././gcc -D_GNU_SOURCE -std=gnu99 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wold-style-definition -Wextra -Wwrite-strings -O2 -g -O2 -c ../../../gcc/libgfortran/io/unix.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/unix.o /tmp/cccbx6w4.s: Assembler messages: /tmp/cccbx6w4.s:4398: Error: symbol `fstat64' is already defined /tmp/cccbx6w4.s:4429: Error: symbol `lstat64' is already defined /tmp/cccbx6w4.s:4571: Error: symbol `stat64' is already defined make[3]: *** [unix.lo] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/Develop/mainline_svn/build1/i386-redhat-linux/libgfortran' make[2]: *** [all] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/Develop/mainline_svn/build1/i386-redhat-linux/libgfortran' make[1]: *** [all-target-libgfortran] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/Develop/mainline_svn/build1' make: *** [all] Error 2 I assumed that this is related to the c99 issue (and http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2006-11/msg00054.html ?). So my most recent bootstrapping/testing on ppc and x86 is without fortran (I have tested it with fortran in the past). Is it ok to commit the project this way, or is there a way to build fortran with current mainline? :ADDPATCH docs (vectorizer): thanks, dorit (See attached file: texipatch.txt)
Attachment:
texipatch.txt
Description: Text document
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |