This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: fixincludes for glibc 'inline' non-C99 conformance

From: Steven Bosscher <stevenb dot gcc at gmail dot com>
To: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Cc: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, Mike Stump <mrs at apple dot com>, Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, Geoffrey Keating <geoffk at apple dot com>, Geoffrey Keating <gkeating at apple dot com>, Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>
Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2006 10:48:38 +0100
Subject: Re: fixincludes for glibc 'inline' non-C99 conformance
References: <20061102233822.93B055033BE5@geoffk5.apple.com> <D2B49F98-023F-47FC-820C-401DAACAF50B@apple.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0611040400090.18760@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>

On Saturday 04 November 2006 05:08, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> I also strongly deprecate the lack of cooperation seen lately between GCC
> and GLIBC on both sides, both patches going in to GCC causing GLIBC
> breakage known in advance without a plan for fixing it and GLIBC
> developers failing to review for months patches needed for GCC.  I think
> the GNU project needs to consider how to move to cooperation so that
> developers of both these components of the GNU system bear in mind and act
> in accordance with responsibilities to the other component.

Second that!

Gr.
Steven

References:
- fixincludes for glibc 'inline' non-C99 conformance
  - From: Geoffrey Keating
- Re: fixincludes for glibc 'inline' non-C99 conformance
  - From: Mike Stump
- Re: fixincludes for glibc 'inline' non-C99 conformance
  - From: Joseph S. Myers

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]