This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] PR29033: i18n issue
On Monday 30 October 2006 17:00, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> I would rather have the code look like:
> Though I don't know which one is preferred by the coding style.
As far as I can see, the GNU GCC coding style doesn't specify this particular
case, so the one from the GNU coding style should apply, which I adhered to:
The thing that surprises me is that this doesn't work with the way gcc
extracts the po strings. I don't quite see why the G_() macro is necessary,
but it wasn't important enough to me to debug this in detail.