This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: emulating tls for systems without
- From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
- To: Danny Smith <dannysmith at clear dot net dot nz>
- Cc: "'Richard Henderson'" <rth at redhat dot com>, "'Diego Novillo'" <dnovillo at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 04:17:10 -0400
- Subject: Re: emulating tls for systems without
- References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <000001c6e81b$5b778b80$f74861cb@anykey>
- Reply-to: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 02:12:39PM +1300, Danny Smith wrote:
> Yes, mingw32 is one of those. There are a few small patches to get
> to now work for mingw32 as well, but I was holding off on the small
> stuff until
> stage 1, assuming that the "great stuff" would wait till then.
> Should I still wait?
AFAIK none of them were dependent on the emutls stuff (they just make
libgomp usable on your target and if you don't use threadprivate,
you don't need native TLS nor emutls), all of them were approved by
Richard and IMHO they certainly should go into 4.2.
Sure, it can't be considered a regression bug fix, since OpenMP
support has only been added in 4.2, but all the patches were small,
non-intrusive that I'd say it would be a pitty not to include them