This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [Patch, fortran] PR20541 - allocatable components (TR15541)
- From: Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>
- To: FX Coudert <fxcoudert at gmail dot com>
- Cc: Paul Thomas <paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr>, "'fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org'" <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, patch <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 22:54:40 -0700
- Subject: Re: [Patch, fortran] PR20541 - allocatable components (TR15541)
- References: <452490A3.email@example.com> <DEA77E67-BE96-46B8-BFE7-2088342E60DA@gmail.com>
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 07:38:25AM +0200, FX Coudert wrote:
> Congratulations to Paul and Eric!
> Such long and involved patch is always hard to review, but I'll give
> it a look over the week-end. I'll approve the parts I understand, and
> I will bootstrap and regtest on a couple of platforms (sparc-sun-
> solaris2.9, hppa-hpux, ia64-linux). But, with two person designing
> this patch and so much testing before submitting it, I think we
> should commit it soon to get it exposed, even if the reviewing is not
> of the standard we'd like to enforce (except for the non-insulated
> part of the patch). Opinions?
Again, congrats to erike and pault! If you're ever in the
Seattle area, give me a call. Dinner and a beer is on me.
I too will bootstrap and test the new patch on i386-*-freebsd
and amd64-*-freebsd. I too will spend time over the next
few days reading and reviewing the patch.
I also agree with FX that the patch should be committed
soon for wider exposure. In fact, I'll suggest a Sunday
deadline for reviews. After that commit at it.