This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [Patch, fortran] PR29284 - [4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE for optional subroutine argument
OK to commit. I'm not a huge supporter of moving function calls
around, but I tried to figure it out and I think in this case, the
order is OK.
As I said the other day, I treated this one with enormous care; I both
tested thoroughly and checked out dependences.
I agree - I wasn't greatly convinced of the need to do it this way in
the first place!
[Frankly, for the readability & size difference in the final f951
executable vs maintainance potential trouble ratio, I think it's not a