This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: C++ PATCH: PR 20599 (1/3)

From: "Doug Gregor" <doug dot gregor at gmail dot com>
To: "Mark Mitchell" <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: "Benjamin Kosnik" <bkoz at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, libstdc++ <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "Gabriel Dos Reis" <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 10:57:15 -0400
Subject: Re: C++ PATCH: PR 20599 (1/3)
References: <450A658C.7050109@suse.de> <m3odtbdbk6.fsf@zeus.integrable-solutions.net> <20060919173834.GR31210@synopsys.com> <4rb0h2p88dgivc267gbqccketoqjaf8o64@4ax.com> <m3u033br7h.fsf@zeus.integrable-solutions.net> <4511B690.3010806@codesourcery.com> <4516CCFB.8070903@codesourcery.com> <0535BDD0-FEEB-4C4D-823D-2EC7FC9BC2B6@osl.iu.edu> <20060928163525.8f9ac452.bkoz@redhat.com> <45202D43.10503@codesourcery.com>

On 10/1/06, Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> wrote:

are there objections to the policy set out above?  Point (d) doesn't
mean that we can't predefine many macros (for various features) or that
we have to use any particular value; it's just saying that we'll give
users some way of figuring out what dialect of C++ they're using.

I think this is a good policy.

 Cheers,
 Doug

References:
- Re: C++ PATCH: PR 20599 (1/3)
  - From: Mark Mitchell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]